Integrate the Management Systems

Executive Summary

• There is a big difference between Unified Systems like an EHS system, and an Integrated System like an OEMS
• Unified Systems tend to work independently from standard business processes, and thus pull the organization in different directions
• Companies that operate in an Operationally Excellent manner use an Integrated System that standardizes and improves all interrelated business processes

Understanding your management system’s architecture

We should start with one of the most important factors to the overall effectiveness of your OE program – the level of integration and alignment within your organization. This depends on how well the people, processes and technology or equipment work together to execute your strategy.  In other words, it depends on your management system.

The International Standards Organization (ISO) defines a management system as “…the way in which an organization manages the inter-related parts of its business in order to achieve its objectives”.  We like this definition for its simplicity but also because it highlights that a system is intended to manage all the variables that can impact a desired outcome. Just like a security system would be less effective if it monitored only your front door but not any of the windows or rear doors, a company’s management system needs to account for all the inter-related inputs for a desired outcome.  This is where the idea of an “Integrated System” comes into play. The word “system” is often associated with software tools, but in this sense, we are referring to the entire system of people, processes and equipment working together to execute the strategy.

In terms of Operational Excellence, most management system discussions revolve around managing quality, safety, environmental performance, and the like. When OE practitioners discuss integrated systems, these are the systems they usually have in mind. The most common is the merger of Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS), and in some cases this also includes Quality (EHSQ). These systems are intended to improve and integrate the way the organization manages things that impact performance across those four measures. These kinds of systems are often referred to as Integrated Systems, but we draw a distinction between these systems, which we will call “Unified Systems” and true “Integrated Systems”. The key distinction is, while Unified Systems combine different outcomes, they usually remain independent of the main business practices that introduce and drive the very risks they seek to manage.

Discrete	Unified	Integrated
Discrete Systems are identified by their singular intended outcome, often creating additional processes related to that outcome	Unfied systems are a combination of Discrete Systems; they are consolidated but still operated outside of main business practices	Integrated Systems focus on the existing business practices, coordinating them to achieve all desired outcomes
Safety MS	EHS MS	Chevron OEMS
Quality MS	Process Safety MS	Exxon OIMS
Document MS	Reliability MS	Koch Industries MBM
Environmental MS	Risk MS	Endeavor Management OEMS

For example, each system has requirements for assigning organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities. It is easy to see how an incident can be caused by any individual not understanding his or her role. The problem though is when these systems are adopted, they focus on R&R as they apply to the management system, not as they relate to broader day-to-day roles. What happens often is the focus is placed on defining R&R for the front-line, where the link to quality, safety, and environmental performance is clear, but it rarely addresses roles not clearly linked to the system, such as roles for the
very managers that the “management” system is intending to help.

The same is true for requirements around leadership, planning, communications, documentation, and so on. You can have a world- class process for planning gap-closure and improvement activities related to your HSEQ system, but if the overall business planning process is broken, then the system usually has limited impact on the actual business risk, and often fragments the business around
competing processes.

The limitation of “Unified Systems” – The most common systems today

Unified Systems are, in many ways, better than discrete systems. They are more efficient and simpler, but they all run into the same issues of limited effectiveness, especially within companies that have multiple Unified Systems at once. For an in-depth view on why these systems have limited effectiveness, see our article on Creating a Truly Integrated System. 

Integrated Systems –  a more effective and efficient approach

Companies that effectively and efficiently achieve Operational Excellence utilize an Integrated Management System approach. On the surface, it may seem like semantics, especially since on paper Unified and Integrated Systems look very similar, but in practice they operate very differently. One key difference that goes unnoticed is that Integrated Systems don’t seek to create additional processes; they seek to change existing ones. They focus on how the existing processes introduce risk to the business and seek to improve the ability of existing processes at managing the risk. In an era where most companies are overburdened by complexity, integrated systems stand out by removing rather than increasing complexity.

This is what makes the OEMS so effective – its focus is on making all of the interrelated parts of the business function as one, breaking across silos and barriers in the process. This goes beyond any tools and it is not just about process mapping or optimization. At its core it is about how the organization works together to make better decisions.  

The next few topics will look at distinct characteristics that make some Integrated Management Systems more effective than others.SaveSave

This post is an excerpt from the white paper “The Fundamentals for Transforming Your Organization Through Operational Excellence.”